UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
SCHEDULE 14A |
(Rule 14a-101) |
Schedule14A Information |
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section14(a)of the |
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Filed by the Registrant
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | |
Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Astrotech Corporation |
(Name of Registrant as Specified |
(Name of Person(s)Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
☒ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials |
☐ | |
Fee computed on table |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Proxy Statement
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023
Friday, December 15, 2023
9:00 a.m. (Central Time)
2105 Donley Drive, Suite 100
Austin, Texas 78758
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Thomas B. Pickens III | ||||
![]() | ||||
Director Since: 2004 | ||||
Age: 66 | ||||
Board Committees: | ||||
Chairman of the Board |
Daniel T. Russler, Jr. | Tom Wilkinson | Jim Becker | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Director Since: 2011 | Director Since: 2018 | Director Since: 2022 | ||
Age: 60 | Age: 53 | Age: 53 | ||
Board Committees: Audit, Compensation, and Corporate | Board Committees: Audit (Chair), Compensation (Chair), | Board Committees: Audit, Compensation, and Corporate | ||
Governance and Nominating (Chair) | and Corporate Governance and Nominating | Governance and Nominating | ||
Lead Independent Director |
Bob McFarland | Jaime Hinojosa | |||
![]() ![]() | ![]() | |||
![]() Director Since: 2023 | With Company Since: 2015 | |||
![]() Age: 78 | Age: 41 | |||
Board Director | Chief Financial Officer, | |||
Treasurer, and Secretary | ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |
PROXY STATEMENT
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
November 1, 2023
To the ShareholdersStockholders of Astrotech Corporation:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 (the “Annual Meeting”) for Astrotech Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Astrotech”), to be held at 110 E. Second Street,2105 Donley Drive, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 7870178758 on December 7, 2017,15, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. (Central time). Information about the Annual Meeting, the nominees for directors, and the proposals to be considered are presented in this Notice of Annual Meeting (the “Notice of Annual Meeting”) and the Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) on the following pages. At the meeting you will be asked:
i. | To elect five director nominees to serve as directors until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2024 Annual Meeting”); |
ii. | |
To ratify the appointment of |
iii. |
To transact such other business as may properly come before the |
The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has approved these proposals and the Company urges you to vote in favor of these proposals and such other matters as may be submitted to you for a vote at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on October 25, 201719, 2023 as the record date for determining shareholdersstockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.
As permitted by the “Notice and Access” rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), on or about November 1, 2023, we will mail to our stockholders receiving the proxy materials electronically a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our Notice of Annual Meeting, our Proxy Statement, and accompanying proxy card are being mailed to our shareholders along withand the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172023 (the “Form 10-K”). on the internet. We believe that furnishing these materials electronically allows us to more efficiently provide our stockholders with our proxy materials while reducing costs and reducing the impact of the Annual Meeting on the environment. However, if you would prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials you previously received.
Voting can be completed by returning the proxy card, by telephone at 1-888-457-2959 or online at www.proxyvoting.com/ASTC. Only your latest-dated proxy card will count, and any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting as described in this Proxy Statement. Further detail can be found on the proxy card and in the “Voting of Proxies” section included below.
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials of the Annual Meeting to be held on December 7, 2017.15, 2023. This Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, proxy card, and Form 10-K are available at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For “Investors.”
Thank you for your assistance in voting your shares promptly.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | |
![]() /s/ Jaime Hinojosa | |
Jaime Hinojosa Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Austin, Texas |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE
MEETING, PLEASE MARK, SIGN, AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE TO ASSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT
THE MEETING. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU WISH
TO DO SO, EVEN IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED YOUR PROXY.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This Proxy Statement is furnished to holders of Astrotech'sAstrotech’s common stock, no$0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), as of the record date October 25, 201719, 2023 in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Astrotech Corporation, a Washington corporation, of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting to be held on December 7, 2017,15, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. (Central time) at 110 E. Second Street,2105 Donley Drive, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78701.78758. This Proxy Statement, the accompanying proxy card, and the Form 10-K are being distributed to shareholdersstockholders on or about October 27, 2017.
At the meetingAnnual Meeting you will be asked:
i. | To elect five director nominees to serve as directors until the 2024 Annual Meeting; |
ii. | |
To ratify the appointment of |
iii. |
To transact such other business as may properly come before the |
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
Astrotech is making these materials available to its shareholdersstockholders via the internet. TheOn or about November 1, 2023, we will mail to our stockholders receiving the proxy materials electronically a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our Notice of Annual Meeting, our Proxy Statement, proxy card and our Form 10-K on the internet. The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, proxy card and Form 10-K are available free of charge at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For Investors.”
Record Date and Voting Securities
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on October 25, 201719, 2023 as the record date for the determination of shareholdersstockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. As of the record date, there were 4,506,4731,701,729 shares of Common Stock outstanding, including 48,286which includes 70,671 shares of restricted stock with voting rights. Holders of common stock, including those holder ofCommon Stock and restricted stock with voting rights are entitled to notice of the Annual Meeting and to one vote per share of common stockCommon Stock owned and restricted stock with voting rights granted at the Annual Meeting as of the record date. No shareholderstockholder will be allowed to cumulate votes.
Revocation of Proxies
Each shareholderstockholder giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before the shares represented by that proxy are voted. Revocation of a proxy is effective when the Secretary of the Company receives either (i) an instrument revoking the proxy or (ii) a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. Additionally, a shareholderstockholder may change or revoke a previously executed proxy by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.
How to Vote
Because many Astrotech shareholdersstockholders are unable to attend the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors solicits proxies to give each shareholderstockholder an opportunity to vote on all matters scheduled to come before the meetingAnnual Meeting as set forth in this Proxy Statement. ShareholdersStockholders are urged to carefully read carefully the material in this Proxy Statement and vote through one of the following methods:
i. | Fully completing, signing, dating and timely |
ii. | Calling 1-888-457-2959 and following the instructions provided on the phone line; or |
iii. | Accessing the internet voting site at www.proxyvoting.com/ASTC and following the instructions provided on the website. |
Please keep your proxy card with you when voting via the telephone or internet. All votes via the telephone or internet must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern-time)(Eastern time) on December 6, 201714, 2023 in order to be counted. Each proxy card that is (i) properly executed, (ii) timely received by the Company before or at the Annual Meeting, and (iii) not properly revoked by the shareholderstockholder pursuant to the instructions above will be voted in accordance with the directions specified on the proxy and otherwise in accordance with the judgment of the persons designated therein as proxies. If no choice is specified and the proxy is properly signed and returned, the shares will be voted by the Board appointed proxy in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.
Beneficial owners, who own shares through a broker-dealer or other financial institution can vote by returning the voting instruction form or by following the instructions for voting via telephone or the internet provided by the broker-dealer or other financial institution. If you own shares in multiple accounts or in more than one name, you may receive multiple sets of proxy material. Please vote all your shares.
The Board has appointed Mr. Thomas B. Pickens III, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Directors.the Board, and Mr. Jaime Hinojosa, our Chief Financial Officer, to serve as proxies to vote your shares in accordance with the instructions you submit.
Quorum
The holders of at least a majorityone-third of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stockstock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, whether present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum.
Vote Required for Director Elections
The election of the sixfive directors requires the vote of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting.
Vote Required for Auditor Ratification and for the Amendment to the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan
The ratification of the appointment of BDO USA,RBSM LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the 20182024 fiscal year and the approval of the proposed amendment to the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan requirerequires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the holders of Common Stock.
Method of Tabulation and Broker Voting
One or more inspectors of election appointed for the meetingAnnual Meeting will tabulate the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and will determine whether or not a quorum is present. The inspectors of election will treat abstentions as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum andquorum.
What are “broker non-votes”?
If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the approvalname of any matter submitted to the shareholders for a vote.
Under the applicable rules governing such brokers, we believe the election of directors (Proposal No. 1) is not likely to be considered a negative“routine” matter. This means brokers may not be permitted to vote on this matter if the outcomebroker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. We believe the ratification of Proposal 2 since those shares will notour independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal No. 2) is likely to be voted “For.” Proposal 3 is considered a “routine” matter, so brokers willand hence your brokerage firm may be able to vote uninstructed shares on those proposals. For Proposal 4, brokers mayNo. 2 even if it does not vote on this proposal withoutreceive instructions from the beneficial owners,you, so broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome for that proposal.
Form 10-K
If you are receiving this by mail, the Form 10-K is being mailed to you with this Proxy Statement. As permitted by the “Notice and Access” rules of the Company’s 2017SEC, we are also making the Notice of Annual Report onMeeting, Proxy Statement, the proxy card, and our Form 10-K. For copies, please contact Investor Relations10-K available to stockholders electronically via the internet at www.astrotechcorp.com under the address of the Company’s principal executive office: Astrotech Corporation, 201 W. 5th Street, Suite 1275, Austin, Texas 78701.heading “Investors.” The Form 10-K and other periodic reports of the Company are also available through the Securities and Exchange Commission's (“SEC”
Results of the Vote
We will announce the preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and disclose the final voting results in a current report on Form 8-K filed with SEC within four business days of the date of the Annual Meeting unless only preliminary voting results are available at the time of filing the Form 8-K. To the extent necessary, we will file an amended report on Form 8-K to disclose the final voting results within four business days after the final voting results are known. You may access or obtain a copy of these and other reports free of charge on the Company’s website at www.astrotechcorp.com. Also, the referenced Form 8-K, any amendments thereto and other reports we file with the SEC are available to you over the internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
List of Stockholders
A complete list of all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be open for examination by any stockholder during normal business hours for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting at our offices, 2105 Donley Drive, Suite 100, Austin, Texas, 78758.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Company’s business affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors in accordance with the Washington BusinessDelaware General Corporation ActLaw and the Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Charter”) and the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and BylawsBy-laws (the “Bylaws”) of the Company. The role of the Board of Directors is to effectively govern the affairs of the Company for the benefit of the Company’s shareholdersstockholders and to ensure that Astrotech’s activities are conducted in a responsible and ethical manner. The Board of Directors strives to ensure the success of the Company through the election and appointment of qualified management, which regularly keeps members of the Board of Directors informed regarding the Company’s business and industry. The Board of Directors is committed to the maintenance of sound corporate governance principles.
The Company operates under corporate governance principles and practices that are reflected in a set of written Corporate Governance Policies which are available on the Company’s website at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For Investors.“Investors.” These include the following:
● | Code of Ethics and Business Conduct |
● | Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers |
● | Shareholder Communications with Directors Policy |
● | Complaint and Reporting Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters |
● | Audit Committee Charter |
● | Compensation Committee Charter |
● | Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter |
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
The Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applies to all directors, officers, and employees of Astrotech. The key principles of this code include acting legally and ethically, speaking up, getting advice, and dealing fairly with the Company’s shareholders.stockholders. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For Investors”“Investors” and a copy is available to the Company’s shareholdersstockholders upon request. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct meets the requirements for a “Code of Conduct” under NASDAQNasdaq rules.
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
The Company’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and Controller. The key principles of this Code include acting legally and ethically, promoting honest business conduct, and providing timely and meaningful financial disclosures to the Company’s shareholders.stockholders. The Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Professionals is available on the Company’s website at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For Investors”“Investors” and a copy is available to the Company’s shareholdersstockholders upon request. The Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Professionals meets the requirements of a “Code of Ethics” under SEC rules.
Shareholder Communications with Directors Policy
The Company’s Shareholder Communications with Directors Policy provides a medium for shareholdersstockholders to communicate with the Board of Directors.Board. Under this policy, shareholdersstockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors or specific Board members by sending a letter to Astrotech Corporation, Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors, Attn: Secretary, 201 W. 5th Street,2105 Donley Drive, Suite 1275,100, Austin, Texas 78701.78758. Such communications should specify the intended recipient or recipients. All such communications, other than unsolicited commercial solicitations, will be forwarded to the appropriate director, or directors, for review.
Complaint and Reporting Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters
The Company’s Complaint and Reporting Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters provide for the (i) receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints, reports, and concerns regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and (ii) confidential, anonymous submission of complaints, reports, and concerns by employees regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. Complaints may be made to a toll-free independent “Integrity Helpline” telephone number and to a dedicated e-mail address. Complaints received are logged by the Company’s legal counsel, communicated to the Company’s Audit Committee, and investigated under the direction of the Company’s Audit Committee. In accordance with Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, these procedures prohibit the Company from taking adverse action against any person submitting a good faith complaint, report, or concern.
The Board of Directors Role in Risk Oversight
The Board has determined that the combined role of Chairman and CEO is appropriate for the Company as it promotes unified leadership and direction for the Company, allowing for a single, clear focus for management to execute the Company’s strategy and business plans. This structure also avoids the added costs and inefficiencies that would result by mandating an independent Chairman. The Board believes that the governance structure allows the Board to effectively work with the combined role of Chairman and CEO.
At the selection of the Board, Tom Wilkinson serves as lead independent director (the “Lead Director”). The Lead Director acts as a key liaison with the CEO and assists the Chairman in setting the Board agenda, chairs executive sessions of the Board, identifies and reviews strategic opportunities, and communicates Board member feedback to the CEO. The Board believes this approach appropriately and effectively complements the combined role of DirectorsChairman and CEO.
The Board strives to balance the risk and return ratio for all Astrotech shareholders.stockholders. In doing so, management maintains regular communication with the Board, of Directors, both on a formal and informal basis. This includes conversations on the state of the business, the industry, and the overall economic environment with Astrotech management during formal Board of Directors meetings, formal Committee meetings, and in more frequent informal conversations. Additionally, the Board of Directors utilizes its committees to consider specific topics which require further focus, skill sets, and/or independence. The Audit Committee coordinates the Board of Directors’Board’s oversight of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, and code of conduct. Management regularly reports to the Audit Committee on these areas. The Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs. The NominatingCorporate Governance and Corporate GovernanceNominating Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with Board of Directors’the Board’s organization, membership and structure, succession planning for our directors, and corporate governance.
Board of Directors
The Board held a total of six12 meetings during fiscal 2017year 2023 and acted four14 times by written consent. All of our directors are expected to attend each meeting of our Board and the committees on which they serve and are encouraged to attend annual shareholderstockholder meetings, to the extent reasonably possible. All directors attended more than 99%100% of the aggregate of the meetings of our Board and committees on which they served in fiscal 2017year 2023 held during the period in which they served as directors. All of the directors attended our 20162022 annual meeting of shareholders.
Committees of the Board of Directors
During fiscal year 2017,2023, the Board of Directors had three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
Each such committee currently consists of three persons, and each member of the Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees meet the independence requirements of the NASDAQ’sNasdaq’s Listing Rules.
The Company periodically reviews, both internally and with the Board, of Directors, the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the SEC and NASDAQNasdaq regarding corporate governance policies, processes, and listing standards. In conformity with the requirement of such rules and listing standards, we have adopted a written Audit Committee Charter, a Compensation Committee Charter, and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, each of which may be found on the Company’s website at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For Investors”“Investors” or by writing to Astrotech Corporation, Attn: Investor Relations, 201 W. 5th Street,2105 Donley Drive, Suite 1275,100, Austin, Texas 7870178758 and requesting copies.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is composed solely of independent directors that meet the requirements of NASDAQNasdaq and SEC rules and operates under a written charter adopted by the Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.Board. The charter is available on the Company’s website at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For Investors.“Investors.” The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing and compensating a firm of independent auditors to audit the Company’s financial statements, as well as oversight of the performance and review of the scope of the audit performed by the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee also reviews audit plans and procedures, changes in accounting policies, and the use of the independent auditors for non-audit services. As of the end of fiscal year 2017,2023, the Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. CantwellWilkinson (Chairman) and, Russler, and Ms. Manning. Becker.
During fiscal year 2017,2023, the Audit Committee met four times. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Cantwell andWilkinson, Russler, and Ms. ManningBecker met the qualification guidelines as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation for, and overseeing the work of BDO USA, LLP, the Company’s independent auditor. Audit Committee policy requires the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. The policy, as amended, provides for the general pre-approval of specific types of services and gives detailed guidance to management as to the specific audit, audit-related, and tax services that are eligible for general pre-approval. For both audit and non-audit pre-approvals, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with applicable law and SEC rules and regulations concerning auditor independence.
The policy delegates to the Chairman of the Audit Committee the authority to grant certain specific pre-approvals, provided that the Chairman of the Audit Committee is required to report the granting of any pre-approvals to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The policy prohibits the Audit Committee from delegating to management the Audit Committee’s responsibility to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor.
Requests for pre-approval of services must be detailed as to the particular services proposed to be provided and are to be submitted by the CFO. Each request generally must include a detailed description of the type and scope of services, a proposed staffing plan, a budget of the proposed fees for such services, and a general timetable for the performance of such services.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors that meet the requirements of NASDAQNasdaq and SEC rules and operates under a written charter adopted by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors in May 2004 and amended in May 2005. The charter is available on the Company’s website at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For Investors.“Investors.” The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation and benefits of all executive officers of the Company and establishing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of employees of the Company. The Compensation Committee is delegated all authority of the Board of Directors as may be required or advisable to fulfill the purposes of the Compensation Committee. Meetings may, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, include members of the Company’s management, other members of the Board, of Directors, consultants or advisors, and such other persons as the Compensation Committee or its chairperson may determine in an informational or advisory capacity.
The Board of Directors annually considers the performance of our Chief Executive Officer. Meetings to determine the compensation of the CEO must be held in executive session. Meetings to determine the compensation of any officer of the Company other than the CEO may be attended by the CEO, but the CEO may not vote on these matters.
The Compensation Committee also administers the Company’s 2011 Stock Incentive Plan and 2008 Stock2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in that plan. In addition, to the extent awards remain outstanding under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Prior Plans”), we administer the Prior Plans and those plans.prior awards in accordance with the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the Prior Plans and the applicable award agreements. As of the end of fiscal year 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee consisted of Ms. Manning (Chairwoman)Messrs. Wilkinson (Chairman), Russler, and Messrs. Humphrey and Cantwell.Becker. During fiscal year 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee met three times.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was created by the Board of Directors.Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is comprised solely of independent directors that meet the requirements of NASDAQNasdaq and SEC rules and operates under a written charter adopted by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.Board. The charter is available on the Company’s website at www.astrotechcorp.com under the heading “For Investors.“Investors.” The primary purpose of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is to provide oversight on the broad range of issues surrounding the composition and operation of the Board, of Directors, including identifying individuals qualified to become Board of Directors members and recommending director nominees for the next Annual Meetingannual meeting of Shareholders.stockholders. As of the end of fiscal year 2017,2023, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consisted of Messrs. Russler (Chairman), Adams,Wilkinson, and Humphrey.Becker. During fiscal year 2017,2023, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met one time.
Director Nomination Process
Regarding nominations for directors, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies nominees in various ways. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the current directors that have expressed interest in, and that continue to
● | the candidate’s independence; |
● | the candidate’s depth of business experience; |
● | the candidate’s availability to serve; |
● | the candidate’s integrity and personal and professional ethics; |
● | the diversity of experience and background relative to the Board as a whole; and |
● | the need for specific expertise on the Board. |
The above criteria are not exhaustive and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may consider other qualifications and attributes which they believe are appropriate in evaluating the ability of an individual to serve as a member of the Board of Directors. In order to ensure that the Board of Directors consists of members with a variety of perspectives and skills, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has not set any minimum qualifications and also considers candidates with appropriate non-business backgrounds. Other than ensuring that at least one member of the Board of Directors is a financial expert and a majority of the Board of Directors meet all applicable independence requirements, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee looks for how the candidate can adequately address his or her fiduciary requirement and contribute to building shareholderstockholder value. With regards to diversity,While the Company doesBoard has not haveadopted a formal policy forwith regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying Director nominees, it is one of the factors considered when identifying individuals for Board of Director candidates, but Company practice has historically considered this in director nominees and themembership. The Company expects to continue to consider diversity in future nomination and review processes. In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(f), the Company discloses certain self-identified personal demographic characteristics of its directors. For more information, see “Information About Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers -Board Diversity Matrix.”
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider, for possible Board endorsement, director candidates recommended by shareholders.stockholders. For purposes of the 2017 Annual Meeting, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider any nominations received by the Secretary from a shareholderstockholder of record on or before October 8, 2017 (the 60th calendar day before the Annual Meeting).September 16, 2023. Any such nomination must be made in writing, must be accompanied by all nominee information that is required under the federal securities laws, and must include the nominee’s written consent to be named in this Proxy Statement.serve as a director if elected. The nominee must be willing to allow the Company to complete a background check. The nominating shareholderstockholder must submit their name and address, as well as that of the beneficial owner, if applicable, and the class and number of shares of Astrotech common stockCommon Stock that are owned beneficially and of record by such shareholderstockholder and such beneficial owner. Finally, the nominating shareholderstockholder must discuss the nominee’s qualifications to serve as a director.
Director Attendance at Annual ShareholderStockholder Meetings
The Board of Directors members are expected to attend our annual shareholderstockholder meetings. All of our six directors attended our 20162022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Section16(a)Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors, executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s common stockCommon Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Such directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% shareholdersstockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish to the Company copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Due dates for the reports are specified by those laws, and the Company is required to disclose in this document any failure in the past fiscal year to file by the required dates. Based solelyupon a review of the copies of such forms furnished to us, we believe that all filings required to be made pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the year ended June 30, 2023 (and the subsequent period through the date of this proxy statement) were filed in a timely manner by our officers and directors, however filed a late Form 4 was filed on written representationsSeptember 7, 2022 by Braden Michael Leonard, the managing member of BML Capital Management, LCC, the general partner of BML Investment Partners, L.P., which owns more than 10% of the Company’s directors and executive officers and on copies of the reports that they have filed with the SEC, the Company’s belief is that all of Astrotech’s directors and executive officers complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions in the Company’s equity securities during fiscal year 2017.common stock.
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, has carefully considered all director nominees. Upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board of Directors has nominated Thomas B. Pickens III, Mark Adams, Sha-Chelle Manning, Daniel T. Russler, Jr., Ronald W. Cantwell,Tom Wilkinson, Jim Becker and Michael R. HumphreyBob McFarland to the Board of Directors to serve as directors until the 20182024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.Meeting. Each nominee has agreed to serve if elected.
All directors shall hold office until the next Annual Meetingannual meeting of Shareholdersstockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or their earlier removal, death, retirement, disqualification or resignation from office. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorizeCharter authorizes the Board of Directors from time to time, by the vote of a majority of the entire Board, to determine the number of its members. Vacanciesmembers subject to the limitations specified therein. Any vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from an increase in unexpired terms and any additional director positions created by Board action maythe number of directors shall be filled exclusively by actiona majority of the existing Board of Directors at that time,directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, and any director who is appointed in this fashion will serveshall hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholdersstockholder’s meeting at which directors are elected and until ahis successor is duly elected and qualified or theiruntil his earlier removaldeath, resignation, retirement, disqualification or resignationremoval from office.
The Board of Directors has determined that fivefour of the sixfive director nominees (indicated by asterisk in the table below) have no relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and are “independent directors” as defined by Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ’sNasdaq’s Listing Rules.
Not less than annually, the Board of Directors undertakes the review and approval of all related party transactions. Related party transactions include transactions valued at greater than $120,000 between the Company and any of the Company’s executive officers, directors, nominees for director, holders of greater than 5% of Astrotech’s shares, and any of such parties’ immediate family members. The purpose of this review is to ensure that such transactions, if any, were approved in accordance with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and for the purpose of determining whether any of such transactions impacted the independence of such directors. ThereDuring fiscal years 2021 and 2022, the Company held two secured promissory notes totaling $2.5 million with Mr. Thomas B. Pickens, III, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The promissory notes originally matured on September 5, 2020; however, on August 24, 2020, the Company and Mr. Pickens agreed to extend the maturity date of the promissory notes to September 5, 2021. On September 3, 2021, the Company and Mr. Pickens further amended the promissory notes, whereby (i) one note was paid in full and cancelled with payment of the outstanding principal amount of $1.0 million plus accrued interest of $172,000 and (ii) the other note’s maturity date was extended to September 5, 2022 and the outstanding principal amount was reduced to $500,000 with payment of a principal amount of $1.0 million plus accrued interest of $330,000. On September 5, 2022, the remaining principal amount of $500,000 matured and was repaid in full plus accrued interest of $55,000. Except as set forth above, there were no suchother related party transactions induring fiscal year 20172023 in which (i) we have been a participant, (ii) the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or 2016.will exceed $120,000 and (iii) any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of such individuals, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. The Board has affirmatively determined that none of the independent directors is an officer or employee of the Company or any of Astrotech’s subsidiaries and none of such persons have any relationships which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Ownership of a significant amount of our stock, by itself, does not constitute a material relationship.
The Board of Directors held fifteen12 meetings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172023 and all directors attended at least 99%100% of the meetings of the Board of Directors.and committees. The members of each committee and the chair of each committee are appointed annually by the Board of Directors.
Information about the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock beneficially owned by each director appears later in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Security Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers, and Principal Shareholders.Stockholders.”
Vote Required for Approval of this Proposal
The election of the five directors requires the vote of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon (meaning that the director nominees who receive the highest number of shares voted “for” their election are elected). As a result, withhold votes and “broker non-votes” if any, will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal since only votes “For” a nominee will be counted.
Directors’ Recommendation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:Thomas B. Pickens III | Tom Wilkinson * | |
Jim Becker * | Daniel T. Russler, Jr. * | |
Bob McFarland * | ||
* Indicates independent director |
INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS, NOMINEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Current Directors Nominated for Re-election
Thomas B. Pickens III | |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Astrotech Corporation | |
Mr. Pickens currently serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Astrotech Corporation (Nasdaq: ASTC) and has held that position since January 2007. Mr. Pickens also currently serves as CEO of the Astrotech subsidiaries Astrotech Technologies Inc, 1st Detect. AgLAB Inc., and BreathTech Corporation. | |
Mr. Pickens received a Bachelors of Arts in Economics, Computer Science and Engineering from Southern Methodist University. From 1982 to 1984, Mr. Pickens was | |
Mr. Pickens is currently the Chairman of the Board of Astrotech Corporation, Astrotech Technologies, Inc., 1st Detect Corporation, AgLAB, Inc., and BreathTech Corporation. He also currently serves on the board of NaturalShrimp Incorporated (OTC: SHMP) and Chroma, Inc. Mr. Pickens was previously the Chairman of the Board of Xplore Technologies Corporation until it was sold to Zebra Technologies (Nasdaq: ZBRA) in July 2018. He has served as the Chairman of the Board of Astrotech Space Operations, Inc., Beta Computer Systems, Inc., Catalyst Energy Corporation, United Thermal (NYSE), Century Power Corporation, Vidilia Hydroelectric Corporation, U.S. Utilities, Great Southern Water Corp. and South Carolina Water & Sewer, Inc. He has served as a member on the boards of Trenwick America Reinsurance Corporation, Spacehab Inc. (Nasdaq), Advocate MD, Optifab, Inc. (Nasdaq) and was the New York chapter Chairman of United Shareholders Association, a shareholders’ rights organization. Mr. Pickens was selected to serve on the Board based on the valuable experience he brings in his capacity as our CEO along with his extensive experience and knowledge of our industry. |
Daniel T. Russler, Jr. | |
Principal, Family Asset Management, LLC | |
Daniel Russler has more than | |
Mr. Russler received |
Tom Wilkinson |
Chief Executive Officer, Sonim Technologies |
Mr. Wilkinson is | |
Mr. |
Jim Becker |
Founder and CEO of Becker Logistics |
Mr. Becker is the founder and CEO of Becker Logistics, LLC. He has overseen significant growth in its revenue by following the core values of integrity, quality, innovation, safety, competitiveness, openness, respect, and equal work life balance. He currently serves as a Chairman of Membership Committee for the Transportation Intermediaries Association where he also served as an At-Large Board Member for two terms from 2013-2019. Mr. Becker also serves as an Executive Advisory Committee Member for McLeod Software and is the creator of Jenna’s Foundation. In July 2021, Mr. Becker was appointed to the board of The Monroe Institute, a non-profit organization. Mr. Becker received a certificate in Mergers and Acquisitions from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and attended Northwestern University for Leadership and Organizational Behaviorism. |
Mr. Becker brings to our Board extensive leadership, with a focus on strategic market growth and expansion, and business process improvements and scaling, along with public speaking and corporate management skills. He serves on the Compensation |
Bob McFarland Board of Advisors of Veterans Advantage Mr. McFarland served as an Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology and Chief Information Officer at the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) from January 2004 through his retirement in 2006. In this role, he advised the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on matters pertaining to acquisition and management of IT systems. He was also responsible for overseeing operation of the VA’s computer systems and telecommunication networks for medical information, veterans’ benefits payments, life insurance programs, and financial management systems. Prior to his tenure at the VA, Mr. McFarland served as Vice President of Governmental Relations for Dell Computer Corporation. He joined Dell in 1996 as Vice President and General Manager of the Federal Business segment. He held several senior executive positions at Dell, including managing its global segment, large corporate accounts, and government sector. Under his leadership, Dell became a leading supplier of computer systems to the federal government. In 1998, Mr. McFarland was named to the “Federal 100,” a joint government and industry award designating the top 100 executives in the federal marketplace. Mr. McFarland currently serves on the Board of Advisors of Veterans Advantage. He has previously served as Director for Xplore Technologies Corporation (Nasdaq: XPLR), CSIdentity Corporation, Ezenia! Inc. (OTC: EZEN), and Isothermal Systems Research Inc. Mr. McFarland has a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Management from LeTourneau University in Longview, Texas. |
Board Diversity Matrix
In compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rules 5605(f) and 5606, our Board has self-reported the diversity characteristics summarized in the Board Diversity Matrix table below. The information presented below is based on voluntary self-identification responses we received from each director. Each of the categories listed in the table below has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f).
Board Diversity Matrix as of November 1, 2023 | ||||
Total Number of Directors | 5 | |||
Part I: Gender Identity | Female | Male | Non-Binary | Did Not Disclose Gender |
Directors | — | 5 | — | — |
Part II: Demographic Background | ||||
African American or Black | — | — | — | — |
Alaskan Native or Native American | — | — | — | — |
Asian | — | — | — | — |
Hispanic or Latinx | — | — | — | — |
White | — | 5 | — | — |
Two or More Races or Ethnicities | — | — | — | — |
LGBTQ+ | — | |||
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background | — |
Nasdaq Rule 5605(f)(2)(D) requires companies with boards of directors of five or few members to have at least one member of the board of directors who is “Diverse” (as that term is defined in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f)(1)). We do not currently have a “Diverse” director as required by Nasdaq Rule 5605(f)(2)(D).
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for recommending nominees for Board membership to fill vacancies or newly created positions, and for recommending the persons to be nominated for election to the Board. In connection with the selection and nomination process, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee expects to review the desired experience, skills, diversity and other qualities to ensure appropriate Board composition, taking into account the current Board members and the specific needs of the Company and our Board. Given our small size and technical and specialized industry, the Board has been unable to find diverse candidates willing to serve on the Board that possess the qualifications, experience and backgrounds sought. Despite these challenges, the Company remains committed to diversity and is seeking to identify potential new diverse candidates for Board membership. While the Board does not have a formal policy specifying how diversity of background and personal experience should be applied in identifying or evaluating director candidates, we believe that it is desirable to have a variety of viewpoints on the Board, which may be enhanced by a mix of different professional and personal backgrounds and experience. Our Company and our Board greatly value the skills, experience and contributions of many diverse members of our team, including our Chief Financial Officer.
Director Independence and Financial Experts
The Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charters require that each member meet: (i) all applicable criteria defining “independence” that may be prescribed from time to time under NASDAQNasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2), Rule 10A-(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and other related rules and listing standards and (ii) the criteria for a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (iii) the criteria for an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Company’s Board of Directors also annually makes an affirmative determination annually that all such “independence” standards have been and continue to be met by the independent directors and members of each of the three committees, that each director qualifying as independent is neither an officer nor an employee of Astrotech or any of its subsidiaries nor an individual that has any relationship with Astrotech or any of its subsidiaries, or with management (either directly or as a partner, shareholderstockholder or officer of an entity that has such a relationship) which, in the Board of Directors’Board’ opinion, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In addition, a director is presumptively considered not independent if:
● | The director, at any time within the past three years, was employed by Astrotech or any of its subsidiaries; |
● | The director or a family member received payments from Astrotech or any of its subsidiaries in excess of $120,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the preceding three years (other than for Board or Committee service, from investments in the Company’s securities or from certain other qualifying exceptions); |
● | The director is, or has a family member who is, a partner, an executive officer or controlling stockholder of any entity to which Astrotech made to or received from payments for property or services in the current or in any of the prior three years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more (other than, with other minor exceptions, payments arising solely from investments in the Company’s securities); |
● | The director is, or has a family member who is, employed as an executive officer of Astrotech or any of its subsidiaries any time within the prior three years; |
● | The director is, or has a family member who is, employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time within the prior three years any of Astrotech’s officers served on the compensation committee of the other entity; or |
● | The director is, or has a family member who is, a current partner of Astrotech Corporation’s independent auditing firm, or was a partner or employee of that firm who worked on the Company’s audit at any time during the prior three years. |
The Board of Directors has determined each of the following directors and director nominees to be an “independent director” as such term is defined by Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQNasdaq Listing Rules: Mark Adams, Sha-Chelle Manning, Daniel T. Russler, Jr., Ronald W. CantwellTom Wilkinson, Jim Becker and Michael R. Humphrey.
The Board of Directors has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee during the past fiscal year and the proposed director nominees for the upcoming fiscal year meets the independence requirements applicable to those Committees prescribed by NASDAQNasdaq and SEC rules.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Except as set forth above under the section heading “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors,” there were no other transactions or series of similar transactions to which we were a party, and there is currently no proposed transactions or series of similar transactions to which we will be a party, in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed the lesser of (i) $120,000 or (ii) one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Director or Officer Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
The Company’s directors and executive officers were not involved in any legal proceedings described in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K in the past ten years.
On April 15, 2021, a putative stockholder of the Company commenced a class action and derivative lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery, Stein v. Pickens, et al., C.A. No. 2021-0322-JRS (the “Stein Action”), in which it was alleged, among other things, that the Company improperly included broker non-votes in the tabulation of votes counted in favor to approve an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation (the “2020 Certificate Amendment”) and, thus the 2020 Certificate Amendment was defective. The Company investigated those allegations and does not believe that the filing and effectiveness of the 2020 Certificate Amendment was either invalid or ineffective. Nevertheless, to resolve any uncertainty, on April 30, 2021, the Company filed a validation proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery, In re Astrotech Corporation, C.A. No. 2021-0380-JRS, pursuant to Section 205 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. On October 6, 2021, the Delaware Court of Chancery granted the Company’s request and confirmed and validated the 2020 Certificate Amendment. Thereafter, a settlement in principle was reached with the Plaintiffs in the Stein Action and the parties to the Stein Action presented the settlement to the Court for approval. On February 13, 2023, the Court approved the settlement, awarded the Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and expenses of $290,000, paid prior to the end of fiscal year 2023 and entered a final order and judgment dismissing the Delaware Action with prejudice. The parties to the settlement recognize that entry into the settlement does not constitute an admission of liability, wrongdoing, or any matter of fact or law.
Executive Officers and Key Employees of the Company Who Are Not Nominees
Set forth below is a summary of the background and business experience of the executive officers of the Company who are not also nominees of the Board of Directors as of June 30, 2017:
Jaime Hinojosa | |
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | |
Mr. Hinojosa joined Astrotech | |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth as of September 30, 2017October 19, 2023 certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of outstanding Common Stock held by (i) each person known by the Company to be a beneficial owner ofall persons who beneficially own more than 5% of anythe outstanding classCommon Stock of the Company, to the knowledge of the Company’s capital stock,management, (ii) each ofcurrent director, (iii) each named executive officer listed in the Company’s directors, (iii) the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and two most highly compensated executive officers at the end of the Company’s last completed fiscal year,Summary Compensation Table and (iv) all current directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.
Unless otherwise described below, each of the persons listed in the table below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned by each party.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owners | Shares of Common Stock (#) | Unvested Restricted Stock Grants (#) | Shares Subject to Options Exercisable Within 60 Days of June 30, 2017 | Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Class (1) | ||||||||||
Certain Beneficial Owners | |||||||||||||||
Huckleberry Investments LLP (2) | 537,377 | — | — | 537,377 | 13.1 | % | |||||||||
Beck Capital Management (3) | 363,303 | — | — | 363,303 | 8.8 | % | |||||||||
Bruce & Co., Inc. (4) | 214,015 | — | — | 214,015 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||
Non-Employee Directors: (5) | |||||||||||||||
Mark Adams | 108,003 | — | 21,000 | 129,003 | 3.1 | % | |||||||||
Sha-Chelle Devlin Manning | 21,342 | — | 12,000 | 33,342 | * | ||||||||||
Daniel T. Russler | 15,800 | — | 12,000 | 27,800 | * | ||||||||||
Ronald W. Cantwell | 4,999 | 4,998 | — | 9,997 | * | ||||||||||
Michael R. Humphrey | 4,999 | 4,998 | — | 9,997 | * | ||||||||||
Named Executive Officers: (5) | |||||||||||||||
Thomas B. Pickens III | 696,401 | — | 42,500 | 738,901 | 18.0 | % | |||||||||
Eric Stober | 93,295 | — | 4,800 | 98,095 | 2.4 | % | |||||||||
Rajesh Mellacheruvu | 35,006 | 4,333 | 39,333 | 78,672 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (8 persons) | 979,845 | 14,329 | 131,633 | 1,125,807 | 26.6 | % |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owners | Shares of Common Stock (#) | Unvested Restricted Stock Grants (#) | Shares Subject to Options Exercisable Within 60 Days of October 19, 2023 | Preferred Shares with an Option to Convert on a 1:30 Basis | Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Class (1) | |||||||||||||
5% Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||
BML Investment Partners, L.P. (2) | 232,065 | — | — | — | 232,065 | 13.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Non-Employee Directors: (3) | |||||||||||||||||||
Daniel T. Russler, Jr. | 6,924 | 6,443 | 166 | — | 13,533 | * | |||||||||||||
Tom Wilkinson | 9,231 | 7,722 | — | — | 16,953 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Jim Becker | 2,580 | 6,110 | — | — | 8,690 | * | |||||||||||||
Bob McFarland | — | 7,150 | — | — | 7,150 | * | |||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers: | |||||||||||||||||||
Thomas B. Pickens III | 82,798 | 41,428 | 9,955 | 280,898 | 143,544 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Jaime Hinojosa | 4,870 | 1,111 | 1,570 | — | 7,551 | * | |||||||||||||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (6 persons) | 106,403 | 69,964 | 11,691 | 280,898 | 197,421 | 11.5 | % |
* | Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. |
1. | Calculated pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Rule 13d-3(d), shares not outstanding that are subject to options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage owned by a person, but not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage owned by any other person listed. As of |
2. | Information based on |
3. |
The applicable address for all non-employee directors and named executive officers is c/o Astrotech Corporation, |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following discussion provides compensation information pursuant to the scaled disclosure rules applicable to “smaller reporting companies” under SEC rules and may contain statements regarding future individual and Company performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of the Company’s compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution stockholders not to apply these statements to other contexts.
The compensation program for our executive officers, as presented in the Summary Compensation Table below, is administered by our Board. The intent of our compensation program is to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders, while providing reasonable and competitive compensation.
The purpose of this Executive Compensation discussion is to provide information about the material elements of compensation that we pay or award to, or that is earned by: (i) the individuals who served as our principal executive officer during fiscal 2023; (ii) our two most highly compensated executive officers, other than the individuals who served as our principal executive officer, who were serving as executive officers, as determined in accordance with the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, as of June 30, 2023, with compensation during fiscal year 2023 of $100,000 or more; and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to clause (ii) but for the fact that such individuals were not serving as executive officers on June 30, 2023. We refer to these individuals as our “named executive officers” (“NEOs”). For 2023, our NEOs and the positions in which they served are listed below.
● | Thomas B. Pickens III, our current Chief Executive Officer; and | |
● | Jaime Hinojosa, our current Chief Financial Officer. |
The following table and footnotes provide information on compensation for the services of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”)NEOs for fiscal year 20172023 and, where required, fiscal year 2016.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Options ($)(3) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||
Thomas B. Pickens III; | 2017 | 464,170 | 116,417 | — | 8,554 | 16,835 | 605,976 | |||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2016 | 450,650 | 118,946 | — | — | 13,840 | 583,436 | |||||||||||||
Eric N. Stober; | 2017 | 290,768 | 61,683 | 409,741 | 4,578 | 14,062 | 780,832 | |||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2016 | 282,298 | 63,023 | — | — | 14,825 | 360,146 | |||||||||||||
Rajesh Mellacheruvu; | 2017 | 269,005 | 57,066 | 436,817 | 43,923 | 8,335 | 815,146 | |||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer | 2016 | 249,314 | 69,431 | 69,397 | 211,407 | 11,082 | 610,631 |
Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Options ($)(2) | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas B. Pickens III | 2023 | 450,000 | — | — | — | 32,958 | 482,958 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2022 | 450,000 | 375,000 | 639,994 | 456,120 | 35,461 | 1,956,575 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jaime Hinojosa (4) | 2023 | 301,731 | — | — | — | 26,614 | 328,345 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2022 | 197,938 | 52,000 | — | 58,774 | 25,882 | 334,594 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eric Stober (5) | 2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Former Chief Financial Officer | 2022 | 320,721 | — | — | — | 20,498 | 341,219 |
1. | |
Mr. Pickens was awarded |
August 2022. | |
2. | The amounts shown in this column |
amount shown assumes no forfeitures. | |
3. | The amounts in this column include the following: |
4. | Mr. Hinojosa was appointed as the Company's Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary following Mr. Stober's resignation from the Company. We had no other NEOs during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 or the period to date. |
5. | Effective April 15, 2022, Mr. Stober resigned from his position as the Company's Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. |
Employment Agreements
The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Pickens on October 6, 2008, which sets forth, among other things, Mr. Pickens’Pickens’s minimum base salary, bonus opportunities, provisions with respect to certain payments, and other benefits upon termination of employment under certain circumstances such as without “Cause,” “Good Reason”Reason,” or in event of a “Change in Control” of the Company. Please see Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control for a description of such provisions. Pursuant to the employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Pickens, his required minimum annual base salary is $360,000. He is eligible for short-term cash incentives, as are all employees of the Company. The employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Pickens was originally set to expire on October 6, 2010 and will continue to automatically renew for one year renewal terms each year unless 60 days’ prior notice is provided by Mr. Pickens or the Company. Mr. Pickens’s employment agreement includes confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions. None of the other NEOs are party to an employment agreement.
Regarding Ongoing Compensation of our NEOs
On March 17, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved a structure to establish a cash bonus and annual equity incentive grants for its CEO and CFO. The purpose of this structure is to provide for retention, encourage high levels of performance, align the interests of executives with stockholders, and reduce the uncertainty that existed in their compensation arrangements. The current structure is as follows:
Salary * | Cash Bonus ** | Equity Incentive** | ||||
Mr. Pickens | 450,000 | 0-100% of Salary | 0-100% of Salary | |||
Mr. Hinojosa | 315,000 | 0-50% of Salary | 0-100,000 Shares |
* To be set annually at the beginning of each fiscal year.
** To be determined annually after the end of each fiscal year.
Cash Bonus Awards
During fiscal year 2017,2022, the Compensation Committee awarded bonuses to directors, NEOs and employees in recognition of individual performance. Each NEO’s maximum bonus is an amount equal to 50% of his annual base salary, subject to Compensation Committee discretion.
Long-Term Equity Compensation Awards
On May 26, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), at the authority2020 annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholders of the Company voted to grant equity compensation awards under our Astrotechadopt the 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”). We also maintain the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008 Stock Incentive Plan”) and the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, (the “2011 Stock Incentive Plan”).
Summary of the 2008 Stock Incentive2021 Plan
The 2008 Stock2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan permits the discretionary award of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards and incentive awards.
Any employee or consultant of the Company (or its subsidiaries) or a director of the Company who, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee, is in a position to contribute to the growth, development, or financial success of the Company, is eligible to participate in the 2008 Stock Incentive2021 Plan. In any calendar year, no covered employee described in Section 162(m)The 2021 Plan permits the plan administrator to select the eligible recipients who will receive awards, to determine the terms and conditions of those awards, including but not limited to the Internal Revenue Code may be granted (in the case of stock options and stock appreciation rights), or have vest (in the case of restricted stockexercise price or other stock-based awards), awards relating to more than 600,000purchase price of an award, the number of shares of Common Stock or cash or other property subject to an award, the term of an award and the maximumvesting schedule applicable to an award, and to amend the terms and conditions of outstanding awards. No participant who is a director, but is not also an employee or consultant, of the Company shall receive awards under the 2021 Plan and be paid cash compensation during any calendar year that exceed, in the aggregate, $250,000 in total value (with cash payout with respect to incentivecompensation measured for this purpose at its value upon payment and any awards paid in cash to such covered employees may not exceed $25,000,000.
The maximum number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock no par value, that may be delivered pursuant to awards grantedreserved and available for issuance under the 2008 Stock Incentive2021 Plan is 1,100,000will be equal to the sum of (i) 1,500,000 shares of common stock; (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock. Any shares subject to an awardStock reserved, but unissued under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan that are forfeited or terminated, expire unexercised, lapse or are otherwise canceled in a manner such that the shares of common stock covered by such award are not issued may again be used for awards under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. A maximum of 1,100,000 shares of common stock may be issued upon exercise of incentive stock options. The maximum number of shares deliverable pursuant to awards granted under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan is subject to adjustment by the Compensation Committee in the event of certain dilutive changes in the number of outstanding shares. Under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, the Company may issue authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, or shares purchased by the Company on the open market or otherwise. In addition,Prior Plans; (iii) the number of shares of common stock available for futureunderlying forfeited awards is reduced byunder the net numberPrior Plans; and (iv) an annual increase on the first day of shares issued pursuant to an award.
No more than 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock (as increased on an annual basis, on the first day each calendar year beginning with the first January 1 following the Effective Date and ending with the last January 1 during the initial ten-year term of the Plan, by the lesser of (A) five percent (5%) of the shares of Common Stock outstanding (on an as-converted basis, which shall include shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise or conversion of all outstanding securities or rights convertible into or exercisable for shares of common stock, including without limitation, preferred stock, warrants or employee options to purchase any shares of common stock) on the final day of the immediately preceding calendar year, (B) 1,500,000 shares of common stock, and (C) such lesser number of shares of Common Stock as determined by our Board) shall be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options.
New shares reserved for issuance under the 2021 Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Company’s Common Stock or shares of Company’s Common Stock that will have been or may be reacquired by us in the open market, in private transactions or otherwise. If any shares of Company’s Common Stock subject to an award under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan that are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or terminated, expire unexercised, lapsesurrendered or are otherwise canceled inif an award terminates or expires without a manner such thatdistribution of shares to the participant, the shares of common stock covered byCompany Common Stock with respect to such award are not issued maywill, to the extent of any such forfeiture, cancellation, exchange, surrender, termination or expiration, again be usedavailable for awards under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. A maximum of 375,000Plan except that any shares of Company Common Stock maysurrendered or withheld as payment of either the exercise price of an award and/or withholding taxes in respect of an award will not again be issued upon exercise of incentive stock options. The maximum number of shares deliverable pursuant toavailable for awards granted under the 2011 Stock Incentive PlanPlan. If an award is subject to adjustment by the Compensation Committeedenominated in the eventshares of certain dilutive changesCompany’s common stock, but settled in the number of outstanding shares. Under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, the Company may issue authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, or shares purchased by the Company on the open market or otherwise. In addition,cash, the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock previously subject to the award will again be available for future awards is reduced bygrants under the net2021 Plan. If an award can only be settled in cash, it will not be counted against the total number of shares issued pursuantof Common Stock available for grant under the 2021 Plan. However, upon the exercise of any award granted in tandem with any other awards, such related awards will be cancelled as to an award.
As exhibited by our responsible use of equity over the past several years and good corporate governance practices associated with equity and executive compensation practices in general, the stock reserved under the 2021 Plan on April 7, 2015 during a Board of Directors meeting.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes information, as of June 30, 2017,2023, regarding our equity compensation plans pursuant to which grants of stock options, restricted stock, and other rights to acquire shares of Company common stockthe Company’s Common Stock may be granted from time to time.
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: | ||||||||||||
2008 Stock Incentive Plan | 66 | $ | 159.00 | — | ||||||||
2011 Stock Incentive Plan | 2,605 | $ | 151.43 | — | ||||||||
2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (1) | 35,495 | $ | 17.99 | 157,208 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders: | ||||||||||||
None | — | $ | — | — | ||||||||
Total | 38,166 | $ | 27.34 | 157,208 |
1. | The total number of securities available for issuance under the 2021 Plan include 5,227 shares previously available under the Prior Plans. |
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) | |||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: | ||||||||||
2008 Stock Incentive Plan | 46,750 | $ | 2.90 | — | ||||||
2011 Stock Incentive Plan | 318,502 | $ | 6.55 | 4,000 | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders: | ||||||||||
None | — | $ | — | — | ||||||
Total | 365,252 | $ | 6.08 | 4,000 |
Outstanding Equity Awards at the End of Fiscal Year 2017
The following table shows certain information about equity awards as of June 30, 2017:
Option Awards (1) | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)(2) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised & Unearned Options (#)(3) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Expiration Date | Number of Shares Not Yet Vested (#)(4) | Market Value of Shares Not Yet Vested at Grant Date ($) | ||||||||||
Thomas B. Pickens III | 22,500 | — | 3.55 | 09/13/2021 | — | — | ||||||||||
20,000 | — | 6.00 | 08/21/2022 | — | — | |||||||||||
— | 40,000 | 5.85 | 05/09/2027 | — | — | |||||||||||
Eric N. Stober | 2,800 | — | 3.55 | 09/13/2021 | — | — | ||||||||||
2,000 | — | 6.00 | 08/21/2022 | — | — | |||||||||||
— | 20,000 | 5.30 | 05/09/2027 | — | — | |||||||||||
Rajesh Mellacheruvu | 5,333 | 2,666 | 16.00 | 04/07/2025 | 4,333 | 13,866 | ||||||||||
34,000 | — | 7.50 | 02/17/2026 | — | — | |||||||||||
— | 25,671 | 5.30 | 05/09/2027 | — | — |
Option Awards (1) | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised & Unearned Options (#)(2) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Expiration Date | Number of Shares Not Yet Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares Not Yet Vested at Grant Date ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas B. Pickens III | 1,333 | — | 175.50 | 05/09/27 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
8,622 | 17,244 | 19.20 | 04/14/32 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 41,428 | 1,406,564 | |||||||||||||||||||
Jaime Hinojosa | 26 | — | 84.90 | 04/07/25 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
100 | — | 159.00 | 05/09/27 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
333 | — | 55.50 | 10/14/29 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
1,111 | 2,222 | 19.20 | 04/14/32 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 1,111 | 67,327 |
1. | All exercisable options will expire 90 days after the date of employee’s termination. |
2. | Options granted |
The following table provides information with respect to the vesting of each NEO’s outstanding exercisable options:
Schedule of Vested Astrotech Stock Option Grants | Amount Vested (#) | |||
Thomas B. Pickens III | 9,955 | |||
Jaime Hinojosa | ||||
1,570 |
Pay Versus Performance
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the relationship between executive compensation and our financial performance for each of the last two completed calendar years. In determining the “compensation actually paid” to our named executive officers, we are required to make various adjustments to amounts that are reported in the Summary Compensation Table, as the SEC’s valuation methods for this section differ from those required in the Summary Compensation Table. The table below summarizes compensation values both reported in our Summary Compensation Table, as well as the adjusted values required in this section for the 2022 and 2023 fiscal years.
Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(1) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(2) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(3) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(4) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment based on TSR ($)(5) | Net (Loss) Income | ||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 482,958 | 517,759 | 328,345 | 329,503 | 35.49 | (9,642,000) | ||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 1,956,575 | 492,084 | 337,907 | 199,916 | 32.33 | (8,330,000) |
(1) | The dollar amounts reported this column are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Pickens, our Chief Executive Officer (the “PEO”), for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. For additional information, see “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table.” |
(2) | The dollar amounts reported in this column represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Pickens, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or, paid to, Mr. Pickens during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Pickens’s total compensation as reported in the SCT for each year to determine compensation actually paid: |
Year | Reported Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO ($) | Exclusion of Reported Value of Equity Awards(a) ($) | Equity Award Adjustments(b) ($) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO ($) | ||||||||||||
2023 | 482,958 | — | 34,801 | 517,759 | ||||||||||||
2022 | 1,956,575 | (1,096,114) | (368,377) | 492,084 |
(a) | Represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and "Options" columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. |
(b) | The equity award adjustments for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the year; (ii) the amount of change as of the end of the applicable year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in same year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vested in the applicable year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on stock or option awards in the applicable year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other component of total compensation for the applicable year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments are as follows: |
Year | Year End Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in the Year ($) | Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years ($) | Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year ($) | Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year ($) | Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year ($) | Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation ($) | Total Equity Award Adjustments ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | — | 75,721 | — | (40,920) | — | — | 34,801 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 728,247 | (826,919) | — | (269,705) | — | — | (368,377) |
(3) | The dollar amounts reported in this column represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Pickens) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding Mr. Pickens) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: for 2023, Mr. Hinojosa, our Chief Financial Officer, and for 2022, Mr. Hinojosa and Mr. Stober, our former Chief Financial Officer. |
(4) | The dollar amounts reported in this column represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Pickens), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the named executive officers as a group (excluding Mr. Pickens) during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the named executive officers as a group (excluding Mr. Pickens) as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for each year to determine the compensation actually paid, using the same methodology described above in Note (2): |
Year | Average Reported Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Exclusion of Average Reported Value of Equity Awards(a) ($) | Average Equity Award Adjustments(b) ($) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs ($) | ||||||||||||
2023 | 328,345 | — | 1,158 | 329,503 | ||||||||||||
2022 | 337,907 | (58,774) | (79,217) | 199,916 |
(a) | Represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and "Options" columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. |
(b) | The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are as follows: |
Year | Year End Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in the Year ($) | Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years ($) | Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year ($) | Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year ($) | Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year ($) | Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation ($) | Total Equity Award Adjustments ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | — | 3,169 | — | (2,011) | — | — | 1,158 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 19,216 | (35,452) | — | (62,981) | — | — | (79,217) |
(5) | Cumulative total shareholder return (“TSR”) is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. No dividends were paid on stock or option awards in 2022 or 2023. |
(6) | The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net (loss) income reflected in our consolidated audited financial statements for the applicable year. |
Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table
We generally seek to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore do not specifically align our performance measures with “compensation actually paid” (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay Versus Performance table.
Compensation Actually Paid and Net (Loss) Income
Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative TSR
All information provided above under the “Pay Versus Performance” heading will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
401(k) Savings Plan
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan that provides eligible employees, including NEOs, with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. All participants’ interests in their deferrals are 100% vested when contributed. Contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participant’s directions. Currently, the Company makes a matching contribution equal to 100% of the first 5% of the compensation a participant contributes to the 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.Code of 1986, as amended. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to the 401(k) plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributed from the 401(k) plan, and all contributions, if any, are deductible by the Company when made. The 401(k) plan does not promise any guaranteed minimum returns or above-market returns; the investment returns are dependent upon actual investment results. Accordingly, when determining annual compensation for executive officers, the Company does not consider the individuals’ retirement plan balances and payout projections.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
As noted above, the Company has entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Pickens that provides for payments and other benefits in connection with termination of his employment for a qualifying event or circumstance and for enhanced payments in connection with such termination after a Change in Control (as defined below). A description of the terms with respect to each of these types of terminations follows.
Termination other than after a Change in Control
The employment agreement provides for payments of certain payments and benefits upon the termination of the employment of the NEO. The NEO’sMr. Pickens. His rights upon termination of his employment depends upon the circumstances of the termination. For purposes of the employment agreement, Mr. Pickens’ employment may be terminated at any time by the Company upon any of the following:
• | His death; |
• | In the event of physical or mental disability where Mr. Pickens is unable to perform his duties; |
• | For Cause where Cause is defined as conviction of certain crimes and/or felonies, intentional and deliberate material fraud and misappropriation, or the willful and continued failure of Mr. Pickens to substantially perform duties; or |
• | Otherwise at the discretion of the Company and subject to the termination obligations set forth in the employment agreement. |
Mr. Pickens may terminate his employment at any time upon any of the following:
• | His death; |
• | In the event of physical or mental disability where Mr. Pickens is unable to perform his duties; |
• | The Company’s material reduction in Mr. Pickens’ authority, perquisites, position, title or responsibilities or other actions that would give Mr. Pickens the right to resign for “Good Reason,” if not cured by the Company within thirty days following Mr. Pickens’s written notice; or |
• | Otherwise at the discretion of Mr. Pickens and subject to the termination obligations set forth in the employment agreement. |
In the event Mr. Pickens’ employment is terminated by the Company (other than for Cause) or due to his death or physical or mental disability whereor by Mr. Pickens with “Good Reason”, then he shall be eligible to receive (i) a cash lump sum payment equal one times the NEO is unablesum of (x) his highest base salary in effect at any time during the 12 month period before his termination, and (y) an amount, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, equal to performbetween 0-50% of the annualized average of the annual bonuses paid or payable to Mr. Pickens for the three years immediately preceding the year in which his duties;
Termination after a Change in Control
A termination after a Change in Control is similar to the severance provisions described above, except that the base salary and annualized average bonuses payable to Mr. Pickens becomes entitledis increased to benefits under these provisions onlyone and one-half times, rather than one times his base salary and annualized average bonuses if his employment is terminated within twelve12 months following a Change in Control. A Change in Control for this purpose is defined to mean (i) the acquisition by any person or entity of the beneficial ownership of securities representing 50% or more of the outstanding securities of the Company having the right under ordinary circumstances to vote at an election of the Board of Directors of the Company;Board; (ii) the date on which the majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company consists
As with the severance provisions described above, the rights to which the NEOMr. Pickens is entitled to under the Change in Control provisions upon a termination of employment are dependent on the circumstances of the termination. The definitions of Cause, Good Reason, and other reasons for termination are the same in this termination scenario as in a termination other than after a Change in Control.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Overview
Astrotech’s director compensation program consists of cash-based as well as equity-based compensation. The Board of Directors recognizes that cash compensation is an integral part of the compensation program and has instituted a fixed and variable fee structure to provide compensation relative to the required time commitment of each director. The equity component of Astrotech’s director compensation program is designed to build an ownership stake in the Company while conveying an incentive to directors relative to the returns recognized by our Shareholders.
Cash-Based Compensation
Effective December 22, 2022, the Company’s directors, other than the Chairman of each the Audit Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees, receiveCommittee, earn an annual cash stipend of $40,000 paid upon the annual election of each non-employee director or upon joining the Board of Directors.$80,000. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receivesearns an annual stipend of $55,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an annual stipend of $47,500, and the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee receives an annual stipend of $45,000,$88,500, recognizing the additional duties and responsibilities of each of those roles.
All directors are reimbursed ordinary and reasonable expenses incurred in exercising their responsibilities in accordance with the Business Expense Reimbursement policy applicable to all employees of the Company.
Equity-Based Compensation
Under provisions adopted by the Board, of Directors, each non-employee director receives 5,000 shares of restricted common stockCommon Stock issued upon his first election to the Board, of Directors, subject to board discretion. Other stock awards are given to the directors at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Restricted stock and stockStock options granted typically terminate in 10 years. Already vested shares do not expire upon termination of the director’s term on the Board of Directors.
Effective December 22, 2022, directors will no longer receive equity base compensation annually.
Pension and Benefits
The non-employee directors are not eligible to participate in the Company’s benefits plans, including the 401(k) plan.
Indemnification Agreements
The Company is party to indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive officers that require the Company to indemnify the directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by WashingtonDelaware state law. The Company’s Articles of IncorporationCharter also requirerequires the Company to indemnify both the directors and executive officers of the Company to the fullest extent permitted by WashingtonDelaware state law.
Fiscal Year 2017 2023Non-Employee Director Compensation Table
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Total ($) | ||||||
Mark Adams | 53,500 | — | 53,500 | ||||||
Sha-Chelle Manning | 59,250 | — | 59,250 | ||||||
Daniel T. Russler, Jr. | 65,500 | — | 65,500 | ||||||
Ronald W. Cantwell | 75,000 | — | 75,000 | ||||||
Michael R. Humphrey | 54,500 | — | 54,500 | ||||||
Total | 307,750 | — | 307,750 |
The table below provides the compensation earned or paid in cash or stock awards to each non-employee director as of June 30, 2023.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||
Daniel T. Russler, Jr. | 67,500 | 22,192 | 89,692 | |||||||||
Tom Wilkinson | 136,000 | 24,033 | 160,033 | |||||||||
Jim Becker | 67,500 | 18,877 | 86,377 | |||||||||
Bob McFarland (1) | 33,333 | — | 33,333 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 304,333 | $ | 65,102 | $ | 369,435 |
1. | Mr. McFarland was appointed to the Board on January 24, 2023. |
The table below provides the number of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock held by each non-employee director as of June 30, 2017.
Name | Aggregate Number of Options Outstanding (#) | Aggregate Number of Unvested Restricted Stock Shares Outstanding (#) | ||||||
Daniel T. Russler, Jr. | 166 | 1,443 | ||||||
Tom Wilkinson | — | 2,722 | ||||||
Jim Becker | — | 1,110 | ||||||
Bob McFarland | — | 2,150 | ||||||
Total | 166 | 7,425 |
Name | Aggregate Number of Options Outstanding (#) | Aggregate Number of Unvested Restricted Stock Shares Outstanding (#) | |||
Mark Adams | 26,000 | — | |||
Sha-Chelle Manning | 17,000 | — | |||
Daniel T. Russler, Jr. | 17,000 | — | |||
Ronald W. Cantwell | 8,000 | 6,666 | |||
Michael R. Humphrey | 8,000 | 6,666 | |||
Total | 76,000 | 13,332 |
PROPOSAL 2 - REINCORPORATION FROM WASHINGTON TO DELAWARE
RBSM LLP has served as the Astrotech Audit Committee engaged BDO USA, LLP asCompany’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. registered public accounting firm since October 12, 2023.
With regards to this proposal, the Board of Directors is requesting the shareholdersstockholders to ratify the appointment of BDO USA,RBSM LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. The ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal year 2018 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the holders of shares of our common stock.
Ratification Requirements and Governance
There is no requirement that the Company submit the appointment of independent auditors to shareholdersstockholders for ratification or for the appointed auditors to be terminated if the ratification fails, but Astrotech believes that it is sound corporate governance to submit the matter to shareholderstockholder vote. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 states the Audit Committee is solely responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the independent auditor. As such, the Audit Committee may consider the appointment of other Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm if the shareholdersstockholders choose not to ratify the appointment of BDO USA,RBSM LLP. Additionally, the Audit Committee may terminate the appointment of BDO USA,RBSM LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm without the approval of the shareholdersstockholders whenever the Audit Committee deems such termination appropriate.
Independence
In making its recommendation to ratify the appointment of BDO USA,RBSM LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018,2024, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision ofall relationships with RBSM LLP and all services rendered by RBSM LLP that may impact its objectivity and independence. There have been no non-audit services provided by BDO USA,RBSM LLP, is compatible with maintaining the independence of BDO USA, LLP. Although BDO USA, LLP is engaged to provide tax preparation work,and the Audit Committee believes the non-audit services provided do not hinder their independence to Astrotech.
Annual Meeting Representation
Representatives of BDO USA,RBSM LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They are also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from the shareholdersstockholders present.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation for, and overseeing the work of BDO USA,RBSM LLP, the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee’s policy requires the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by independent auditors in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. The policy, as amended, provides for the general pre-approval of specific types of services and gives detailed guidance to management as to the specific audit, audit-related, and tax services that are eligible for general pre-approval. For both audit and non-audit pre-approvals, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with applicable law and SEC rules and regulations concerning auditor independence.
The policy delegates to the Chairman of the Audit Committee the authority to grant certain specific pre-approvals, provided that the Chairman of the Audit Committee is required to report the granting of any pre-approvals to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The policy prohibits the Audit Committee from delegating to management the Audit Committee’s responsibility to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditors.
Requests for pre-approval of services must be detailed as to the particular services proposed to be provided and are to be submitted by the CFO. Each request generally must include a detailed description of the type and scope of services, a proposed staffing plan, a budget of the proposed fees for such services, and a general timetable for the performance of such services.
Change in Accounting Firm
On August 1, 2023, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Astrotech Corporation was notified by Armanino LLP (“Armanino”) of its decision to resign as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm as a result of Armanino’s determination to cease providing certain services to public companies. Armanino advised that it would continue to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm until the filing of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 that was filed on September 28, 2023. Armanino’s resignation was not recommended or approved by the Board of Directors of the Company or its Audit Committee and was initiated voluntarily by Armanino.
Armanino’s audit reports on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2022 and 2023 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2022 and 2023 and through August 1, 2023, there were no “disagreements” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) with Armanino on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Armanino, would have caused Armanino to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in connection with its reports on the financial statements for such years.
During the Company’s fiscal years ended June 30, 2022 and 2023 and through August 1, 2023, there have been no “reportable events” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
Audit Fees
Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, for the review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, services that are normally provided by BDO USA, LLPthe Company’s Independent Registered Accounting Firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and attest services, except those not required by statute or regulation. The aggregate fees billed for the fiscal year 20172023 for professional services rendered by BDO USA, LLP was $176,512.Armanino, the Company’s previous Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, were $115,297. The aggregate fees billed for the fiscal year 20162022 for professional services rendered by BDO USA, LLP was $165,802.Armanino were $127,062.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees consist of fees for due diligence, comfort letters, and consents related to equity offerings. The aggregate fees billed by or to be billed by BDO USA, LLPArmanino for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
Tax Fees
Tax fees consist of tax compliance and preparation and other tax services. Tax compliance and preparation consist of fees billed for professional services related to federal and state tax compliance and assistance with tax return preparation. This fee includes services charged related to our R&D tax credits. The aggregate fees billed for the fiscal year 20172023 for professional services rendered by BDO USA, LLP was $40,178.Armanino were $17,320. The aggregate fees billed for the fiscal year 20162022 for professional services rendered by BDO USA, LLP was $66,001.
All Other Fees
The Company paid no other fees to BDO USA, LLPArmanino during the fiscal years 20172023 and 2016.
Vote Required for Approval of this Proposal
The ratification of the appointment of RBSM LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal year 2024 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the holders of shares of our Common Stock. As a result, abstentions, if any, will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal.
Directors’ Recommendation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OFPlans Previously Approved by Security Holder | Options Authorized | (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | (b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | (c) Number of securities remaining available at June 30, 2017 for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) | |||||||||
2008 Stock Incentive Plan (1) | 1,100,000 | 46,750 | $ | 2.90 | — | ||||||||
2011 Stock Incentive Plan (2) | 750,000 | 318,502 | $ | 6.55 | 4,000 |
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee of independent directors which operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.Board. The charter was amended and restated in May 2004.July 2015. Astrotech’s management is responsible for establishing a system of internal controls and for preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Astrotech’s independent auditors are responsible for auditing the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and issuing their report based on that audit. Under the Audit Committee’s charter, the primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities as to (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, (iii) the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, and (iv) the performance of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for selecting and evaluating the independent auditors, reviewing, with the independent auditors, the plans and scope of the audit engagement, and reviewing with the independent auditors their objectivity and independence.
Most members of the Audit Committee are not professional accountants or auditors and, in performing their oversight role, rely without independent verification on the information and representations provided to them by management and Astrotech’s independent auditors. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to certify that the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, that the financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or that Astrotech’s independent auditors are in fact “independent” for fiscal year 2017.2023. The Board of Directors has determined that for fiscal year 2017, Ronald W. Cantwell, Sha-Chelle Manning, and2023, Tom Wilkinson, Daniel T. Russler, Jr., and Jim Becker were audit committee financial experts and such persons are independent as defined under the federal securities laws.
In connection with the preparation of the audited financial statements included in Astrotech’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017:
• | The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with the independent auditors and management. |
• | The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard AS 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. In general, this auditing standard requires the auditors to communicate to the Audit Committee certain matters that are incidental to the audit, such as any initiation of, or changes to, significant accounting policies, management judgments, accounting estimates and audit adjustments, disagreements with management, and the auditors’ judgment about the quality of the Company’s accounting principles. |
• | The Audit Committee received from the independent auditors written disclosures and the letter regarding their independence required by PCAOB Rule 3526, and discussed with the auditors their independence. In general, PCAOB Rule 3526 requires the auditors to disclose to the Audit Committee any relationship between the auditors and its related entities and Astrotech that in the auditors’ professional judgment may reasonably be thought to bear on independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether the independent auditors’ provision of non-audit services to Astrotech was compatible with maintaining their independence. |
Based on the review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 20172023 be included in Astrotech’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
This report is submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
The members of the Audit Committee are:
Tom Wilkinson (Chairman)Sha-Chelle Manning
Daniel T. Russler, Jr.
Jim Becker
The foregoing Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any previous or future documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the report by reference in any such document.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Proxy Solicitation Expense
The Company will bear all expenses of the solicitation, including the cost of preparing and mailing the proxy materials. In addition to solicitation by mail, officers and employees of the Company, without receiving any additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by telephone or facsimile. For the Annual Meeting, the Company will engage Morrow Sodali LLC (“Morrow”) to assist us with the solicitation of proxies and related services for a fee of approximately $10,000,$15,000, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, we have retained Morrow to request brokerage houses, banks, and other custodians or nominees holding stock in their names for others to forward proxy materials to their customers or principals who are the beneficial owners of shares and will reimburse them for their expenses in doing so. The Company does not anticipate that the costs and expenses incurred in connection with this proxy solicitation will exceed those normally expended for a proxy solicitation for those matters to be voted on in the Annual Meeting.
Deadline for Submission of ShareholderStockholder Proposals for Next Year’sYear’s Annual Meeting
Pursuant to Rule l4a-8 under the Exchange Act, in order for a stockholder proposal to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2024 annual meeting, such proposal must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices at 2105 Donley Drive, Suite 100, Austin, Texas, 78758, Attn: Corporate Secretary, no later than July 4, 2024, and must comply with additional requirements established by the SEC. SEC rules set standards for eligibility and specify the types of stockholder proposals that may be excluded from a proxy statement. In addition, the Company’s Bylaws provide that any stockholder who intendwould like to have a proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for presentation at our 2018 Annual Meeting2024 annual meeting of Shareholdersstockholders must submit the proposal to usthe Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices so that it is received by not earlier than the close of business on August 17, 2024, and not later than the close of business on September 16, 2024, unless the date of our corporate headquarters2024 annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after December 15, 2024, in which case the proposal must be received no later than July 12, 2018,the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company. Stockholders who intend to submit a proposal for nomination of persons for election to our Board or a proposal of business at the 2024 annual meeting (other than matters properly brought under Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and included in the Company’s notice of meeting) must be madefollow the procedures prescribed in the Company’s Bylaws. No stockholder proposal was received for inclusion in this Proxy Statement.
Stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our nominees must provide notice the Secretary of the Company that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act in accordance with and within the time period prescribed in the advance notice provisions of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. Shareholders who intend to present a proposal at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders without inclusion of the proposal in our proxy materials are required to provide notice of such proposal to our Corporate Secretary so that such notice is received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices on or after August 9, 2018 but no later than September 8, 2018.Bylaws. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.
Discretionary Voting of Proxies on Other Matters
The Board of Directors for the Company knows of no matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement. In the event that other business properly comes before the meeting,Annual Meeting, or any adjournments thereof, the persons named as proxies will have discretionary authority to vote the shares represented by the accompanying proxy in accordance with their own judgment.
Householding of Proxy Materials
Some banks, brokers, and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. ThisIn addition to furnishing proxy materials electronically, we take advantage of the “householding” rules to reduce the delivery cost of materials. If you are receiving these proxy materials by mail, this means that only one copy of this Proxy Statement may have been sent to multiple shareholdersstockholders in your household. However, stockholders who are receiving these proxy materials by mail and participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. The Company will promptly deliver a separate copy of either documentproxy materials to you if you call or write us at the following address and telephone number: 201 W. 5th Street,2105 Donley Drive, Suite 1275,100, Austin, Texas 78701,78758, Attention: Secretary; telephone: (512) 485-9530. If you would prefer to receive separate copies of the Company’s annual report and proxy statement in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your bank, broker, or other nominee record holder, or you may contact the Company at the above address or telephone number.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | |
![]() /s/ Jaime Hinojosa | |
Jaime Hinojosa Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Austin, Texas |